Ibn-Sina Critique of Aristotelian Metaphysics: A Critical Study

Ibn Sina’s (Avicenna’s) extraordinary venture of recreating the Aristotelian philosophical convention in a manner that concurs with his own comprehension of truth, clarifying and deciding the real essence, degree and point of mysticism involves a position of exceptional significance. In the Ilahiyat (Metaphysics) of Kitab al-Shifa, his most significant philosophical summa, Avicenna not just elucidates his own view about the mystical issues, yet additionally examines and clarifies the topic, substance and motivation behind power in an exhaustive manner. Along these lines, his way to deal with the topic of deciding topic of mysticism prompted certain methodological conversations and brought up a criticism by Ibn Rushd (Averroes), who took diverse situation on the point. Averroes condemns Avicenna’s origination of the extent of mysticism and specifically his perspective on the connection among material science and power. Besides, he accuses Avicenna’s situation for the issue to see if Averroes guarantee that Avicenna didn’t follow Aristotle’s assessment on the topic of transcendentalism is truly correct, and assuming this is the case, precisely how much. I will do this inside the system of Averroes contention, dissecting the essential purposes of his contention. In the principal area, I will manage the cases of Averroes, and in the second segment with Avicenna’s perspective on the substance of mysticism in the light of the primary concerns of analysis by Averroes. What’s more, in the last area, I will contrast Avicenna’s origination and that of Aristotle’s and presents the purpose behind the position taken by Avicenna.