Anaylitical Prospective of Rawl’s Principle of Justice

We all know that in real life people disagree on moral principles because they have conflicting interests and that questions of justice arise in precisely these circumstances. If there were perfect coincidence of interest there would be no disputes requiring adjudication and therefore no call to have principles of justice. So, if ever they are placed in a situation where these conflicting interests cannot influence them, they can reach agreement. There is no disputing the fact that it is a hypothetical rather than an historical condition. This is precisely what Rawls does. Through this research paper, I am working on the principles of justice in distribution specially if person is biased or not biased by special interests arising from their actual positions in society.